Abuse filter log

'@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ +Anxious anticipation with this film, as I expected, ended in emotional catharsis when watching it.<br><br>This time, Quentin Tarantino, who is a genuine author, one of many greatest directors and screenwriters of our time, followed a path somewhat like the one he followed last time with Inglourious Basterds - in both cases as a basis taken a particular time frame from history. At the same time, in both works of the master there is an alternative development of these events, and the historical component is roofed for the sake of entourage, shell, clues, but no more. These films do not show any definite position of the director regarding the events in certain time period (like,'I'm for Jews ', or'I'm for blacks'), and exact adherence to historical facts could be absurd for these films. But'Django Unchained'is also a Western that our true movie lover has long imagined filming. The theme of slavery is traced in the film quite sharply, in detail and essentially original due to the genre. Take, as an example, the key character - a former black slave for a short time transforms right into a full-fledged cowboy (the action occurs ahead of the civil war). I haven't seen anything like this in just about any Western. And, at once, the film in its genre looks solid and atmospheric; you will see some allusions to the classic spaghetti westerns loved by the director. Artistic techniques corresponding to the genre were used (what is the design of the titles). But, for me, it's still not worthwhile considering the film in the framework of only a spaghetti western. By and large, each creation of Tarantino is just a movie of just one genre, which may be characterized only by the director's name and by which only Tarantino himself can shoot. A'western ','war film'as well as'slasher'are a number of the the different parts of his style, which can change or repeat in one film to another, and all this with taste and with a lion's share of irony, but always in a brand new way. Here is the peculiarity of Tarantino as a director - he makes films in accordance with their own rules and together with his own handwriting, and also contrives to pay tribute to the cinema as such in the form of his creations in several ways.<br><br>Everything in the film'Django Unchained'is in harmony with each other. The dialogues are dynamic and interesting, so despite their obligatory duration, they are perfectly balanced and connected with a myriad of spectacular gunfights and [https://www.123movies.builders/ 123movie] action in general. Generally, as always with Tarantino. All of this occurs from the backdrop of excellent landscapes and scenery: saloons, dusty streets of a border town, plantations and farms, along with all kinds of picturesque and not landscapes. The atmosphere of that time period in that your events take place is conveyed very richly as a result of same decorations, costumes, make-up (it seemed in my experience that here, and the smell will blow). At once, the music used in the film may also be very modern, which is often called an interesting anachronism, but which doesn't spoil the film at all and only emphasizes its style. The camera work enables you to savor every shot, that will be flawless, coupled with the editing of the whole picture.<br><br>With regards to the plot, the film is intriguing, captivating, the narration rivets to the screen and doesn't let go, which is the merit of the actors as well. I don't even want to share them, as it is better to see and appreciate their play, the amount and significance of these images. All the actors shine in their roles, which are spelled out colorful and played in the same way. Christoph Waltz correctly said about Tarantino's assist actors that he, as a sculptor, "cuts off all that is unnecessary, consequently of which every actor becomes a part of the sculpture, without even noticing it&rdquo ;.By the way, such things inherent in Tarantino's creations as black humor and violence also played their roles, as always gracefully complementing the structure of the picture.<br><br>There's a certain semantic load in the film, but, as I wrote earlier, there is no position or morality that can be conceptually formalized. If you should be really passionate about watching this film with interest, imbued with it, then, probably, you will feel precisely what mcdougal wanted to state, that is involving the lines of the complete narrative. Many scenes are quite symbolic, many are emotional. I'd even call'Django Unchained'a type of ode to freedom and love. But that is just my impression.<br><br>Quentin Tarantino yet again released a very good and stylish film, the director himself didn't change himself. He has no job better or worse, they are various different and all beautiful and unique. Tarantino is madly in deep love with making films as much as he loves cinema generally speaking (and this is clearly visible in his films), so we're unlikely to ever begin to see the director fall. '